nilay patel

@reckless ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 11, 2019

Created

Tue Jun 11 00:12:17 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

nilay patel @reckless

B: We still have important investments in Whatsapp, there's no revenue there. There are problems with advertising, we should deal with those directly. M: We obviously believe in the value we create, I think it's something to be proud of that we give it out for free — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 11, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

nilay patel @reckless

C: Are ad-based companies doomed to have bad incentives? B: If you try to be really raw capitalist, it costs us way more to have this marginal content on the platform, 10s of thousands of people moderating. That's raw cost, and it has no topline benefit. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 11, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

nilay patel @reckless

M: It's easy to make the argument that if there was a fee it would be better, but it would cut off access B: The lionization of charging people money is so wild to me. It's fundamentally regressive — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 11, 2019 Hibernated