nilay patel

@reckless ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked June 11, 2019

Created

Sat May 11 18:09:29 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

nilay patel @reckless

If the only goal was to “protect democracy,” however you’d define that, the better choice would be to impose such tight regulations on Facebook’s behavior that it would effectively become an agent of the government. But no one is arguing for that... except Facebook. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 11, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

nilay patel @reckless

The reason you’d break up Facebook is to inject competition into the social media and messaging markets, on the theory that consumers will express their preferences for privacy and security given real choices. Not because you want to directly protect elections. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 11, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

nilay patel @reckless

In many ways, strong antitrust enforcement is a conservative policy solution, because it relies on effective and functional markets to solve problems instead of mandating specific policy outcomes through regulation. Facebook does not seem to grasp this! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 11, 2019 Hibernated