Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 17, 2022

Created

Thu Nov 17 08:15:28 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@AnnaGBusse One can, in this description, work backwards. To avoid losing, both sides agree that they will exhaust all moves before triggering any obligate escalation to invocation of Article 5. Ergo, they both agree that they must always leave the other a way out despite their antagonism. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2022

Preceded By

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@AnnaGBusse Okay. Assuming that I understand (which I may not), here is why I’m baffled. You have described a game with two players: NATO (N) and Putin (P). Both players may potentially be ‘atrocious’, but they are logical & self-interested: both N&P see annihilation in direct confrontation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2022

Followed By

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

@AnnaGBusse Okay. Here goes: I don’t see this world. I think it is a first order description at best. When you are this close to NATO territory, every field commander becomes a relevant decision maker. I think I calculated there was fighting 8 hypersonic seconds away from Poland. Wrong? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2022