Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 23, 2022

Created

Sun Nov 06 16:05:41 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

A3 Cont.: “This is why index numbers will one day be properly understood as parallel translation in Fiber Bundles wrt Economic Gauge Potentials. But Zoe doesn’t become Cam morphing into Fatima when voting. So parallel transport is unavailable. Even in topological social choice.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 6, 2022

Preceded By

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

A3 Cont.: Our response: “Ah. That would be true but for 2 differences! First, Indices live in markets with *prices*. Our methods *don’t* live in social choice voting paradigms. Second, agents evolve into their future selves via paths. There’s no ‘morphing path’ in social choice.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 6, 2022

Followed By

Eric Weinstein @EricRWeinstein

Q4: Why do you say indexes are Group-Valued? Isn’t inflation just a number? A4: Here goes. In the most famous case you *can* get away with a number. But that 8.9% style CPI nonsense is actually secretly a 1x1 matrix in GL(1,R). And that actually matters! Why? B/c Non-linearity. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 6, 2022