Alex Epstein

@AlexEpstein ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 6, 2023

Created

Thu Feb 23 19:39:36 +0000 2023

Likes

422

Retweets

Source

Typefully

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

Lynas, like many other authors of “consensus” studies (including Naomi Oreskes and John Cook) is clearly motivated by the desire to use insignificant consensus about some climate impact to drive their desired catastrophe narrative and anti-fossil-fuel political outcome. https://t.co/Rh27A4Bh6S — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023

Preceded By

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

Revealingly, @mark_lynas, lead author of the paper The Guardian falsely labeled as a 99% endorsement of climate emergency, promoted this abuse instead of correcting it, falsely concluding that “undermining the case for action on climate change is not based on science.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023

Followed By

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

97% fallacy 2: It ignores the huge benefits, including climate benefits, of fossil fuels By being coupled with the refrain “listen to the scientists,” the “97%” claim is designed to make you only look at the climate side-effects of FFs when making policy—ignoring FFs’ benefits. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023