Alex Epstein

@AlexEpstein ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 6, 2023

Created

Thu Feb 23 19:39:31 +0000 2023

Likes

465

Retweets

Source

Typefully

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

The 2021 paper found that an overwhelming number of papers sampled agreed with human impact on global warming, but most would not even quantify the human share of warming. This “consensus” definition is extremely vague and has no “emergency” or policy implications at all. https://t.co/S6HHcqJUms — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023

Preceded By

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

Going beyond “97%,” “99%” abuser The Guardian took a paper claiming 99% agreement on humans impacting climate to some extent to mean “99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans.” The “emergency” was just added because The Guardian felt like it. https://t.co/hTG3lLM48P — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023

Followed By

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

Revealingly, @mark_lynas, lead author of the paper The Guardian falsely labeled as a 99% endorsement of climate emergency, promoted this abuse instead of correcting it, falsely concluding that “undermining the case for action on climate change is not based on science.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023