Alex Epstein

@AlexEpstein ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 5, 2023

Created

Thu Feb 23 19:39:16 +0000 2023

Likes

584

Retweets

Source

Typefully

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

“97%” fallacy 1: falsely equating consensus about *some* climate impact with consensus about *catastrophic climate impact* There is consensus that fossil fuel use has some climate impact, but the “97%” claim is used to make you believe the consensus on catastrophic impact. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023

Preceded By

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

While “97% of climate scientists agree” is presented as a logical, scientific argument against fossil fuels, it’s an illogical, unscientific argument that 1. Falsely equates *some* climate impact with *catastrophic* climate impact 2. Ignores the huge benefits of fossil fuels — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023

Followed By

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

The usual purpose of saying “97% of climate scientists agree that climate change is real and human-caused” is to make you believe our climate impact is catastrophic—a “climate crisis.” But neither the statement itself nor the studies it’s based on say our impact is catastrophic. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 23, 2023