Alex Epstein

@AlexEpstein ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 28, 2022

Created

Wed Dec 21 17:13:21 +0000 2022

Likes

191

Retweets

Source

Typefully

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

The fundamental hostility of the "green" movement to energy explains why throughout its history it has never supported current, cost-effective source of energy and only "supported" imaginary sources of energy that might exist in the future. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 21, 2022

Preceded By

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

The core reason that the "green" movement opposes energy is that using energy *by its nature* impacts Earth. Energy is "the capacity to do work," which means transforming our environment. The more energy we use, the more we transform "nature," the more impact we have. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 21, 2022

Followed By

Alex Epstein @AlexEpstein

"Green" leaders supported nuclear—until it became cost-effective, at which point they demonized and criminalized it. "Green" leaders supported natural gas—until it became cost-effective on a global scale thanks to shale energy tech, at which point they demonized it as "fracking." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 21, 2022