Kyle Griffin

@kylegriffin1 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 16, 2020

Created

Fri Oct 09 16:15:04 +0000 2020

Likes

1,477

Retweets

894

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1

Consider the Trump company that received the bulk of the funds: It had no employees, or at least no payroll. It had little income over the years, posting modest profits only twice: $54,924 in 2007 and $420,756 in 2008. Then, in 2016, came a payment of $13,756,623. — PolitiTweet.org

New NYT tax report: Trump engineered a windfall in 2016 as campaign funds dwindled. Tax records expose more than… https://t.co/HYwQG23dxa

Posted Oct. 9, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1

"Unless the payments were for actual business expenses ... claiming a tax deduction for them would be illegal. If they were not legitimate and were also used to fund Mr. Trump's presidential run, they could be considered illegal campaign contributions." — PolitiTweet.org

New NYT tax report: Trump engineered a windfall in 2016 as campaign funds dwindled. Tax records expose more than… https://t.co/HYwQG23dxa

Posted Oct. 9, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1

Seven weeks before the election, something unusual happened. The Trump-Ruffin partnership borrowed $30 million from a bank in LA. Trump signed the loan documents, but Ruffin guaranteed nearly the entire amount. The partnership was not required to disclose how it would be spent. — PolitiTweet.org

New NYT tax report: Trump engineered a windfall in 2016 as campaign funds dwindled. Tax records expose more than… https://t.co/HYwQG23dxa

Posted Oct. 9, 2020 Hibernated