Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Thu Mar 22 04:41:34 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

2/ That Dershowitz used the Clinton impeachment as an analogy for the present situation confirms that he doesn't understand the major shift in the law between the 1990s and today—namely, that Congress is no longer in the business of authorizing Independent Counsels via a statute. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 22, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

1/ Dershowitz says Special Counsels should almost *never* be used because they're (a) inherently political, and (b) *commanded* to find crimes. In fact, Dershowitz is thinking of Independent Counsels—like Clinton faced—who were authorized by Congressional statute. Mueller wasn't. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 22, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

3/ In fact, Mueller was authorized by a DOJ regulation and an authorization letter from the DOJ—and absolutely nothing in the letter commanded Mueller to find a crime, or indicated that he would be subject to any political or Congressional oversight whatsoever. He is nonpartisan. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 22, 2018 Hibernated