Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Mon Mar 05 21:24:28 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

16/ Take all Nunberg said and a scenario emerges: Nunberg said Trump knew of the June 2016 meeting because subsequent correspondence with the president or someone else confirmed to Nunberg that Trump knew of it and—after—tried to secretly facilitate Russia releasing Clinton dirt. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 5, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

15/ To be clear, it would *not* be fine. It would likely be Conspiracy to Commit Computer Crimes or Aiding and Abetting Computer Crimes or some sort of Bribery charge if Trump communicated directly or indirectly with the Russians about releasing their *stolen* Clinton materials. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 5, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

17/ Nunberg, in this view, is refusing to comply not just because he doesn't want to hurt Stone—though that may be so—or because complying with the subpoena could hurt him (though that may be so), but because he thinks his emails may lead toward the discovery of some larger plot. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 5, 2018 Hibernated