Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Thu Mar 01 03:18:47 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

5/ No—what Trump was doing was berating a subordinate who he knew was a witness in a pending criminal investigation (an investigation in which he is a target) for *telling the truth* about having had to lie for him on occasion. This is a textbook case of felony witness tampering. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 1, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

4/ In context, there is simply no reasonable possibility that Trump was berating Hicks for (in his view) *lying*. You wouldn't say "How could you be so *stupid*?" if what you were doing was complaining that someone had maliciously made up a lie about—well—*lying to protect you*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 1, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

6/ Trump's intent is established by his knowledge that Hicks was a potential witness against him; that her truthful testimony hurt him; his tone and words in speaking to Hicks; by the obvious—powerful—effect their force and anger had on her; and by bare common sense as to motive. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 1, 2018 Hibernated