Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Mon Feb 26 16:29:30 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

6/ And that's all I've got to say to the 6.5% of gun owners—1.3% of Americans—who belong to the NRA. Or—rather—the radical fringe *within* that group who oppose any attempt at "well-regulating" guns. The fact is, a majority of NRA members oppose its policy positions (look it up). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 26, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

5/ (Incidentally—I *don't* favor the abolition of private gun ownership. I favor the gun industry being "WELL-regulated," which—given that the phrase "WELL-regulated" appears just once in the Constitution or Bill of Rights—means regulated HEAVILY. *I'm* a strict constructionist.) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 26, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Actually, one point I do want to make: if you make the argument below and think you've crafted a tight analogy between the First and Second Amendments, you haven't read the text of either. "Arms" appears in the Second; it's "speech"—not *newspapers*—in the First. I mean, really. https://t.co/frOehmG — PolitiTweet.org

@SethAbramson Then using your argument freedom of the Press would only apply to newspapers.

Posted Feb. 26, 2018 Hibernated