Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Wed Feb 21 02:19:10 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

2/ In other words, no: nothing here raises questions about Flynn's guilty plea. The judge is noting that a prosecutor's obligation to provide Brady material extends beyond the date of plea if there is new Brady material known to the prosecution. Flynn isn't withdrawing his plea. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Defendants request—and prosecutors must supply—this sort of evidence in all cases. An IG report has been prepared that *may* produce evidence previously unknown to and undiscovered by Flynn—so the judge ordered the evidence produced. Withdrawing a guilty plea is *extremely* hard. https://t.co/OcJ1FJ — PolitiTweet.org

NEW: Judge's order for Mueller to turn over evidence on Flynn raises questions about his guilty plea… https://t.co/JHrJEYKWao

Posted Feb. 21, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

3/ In theory, post-plea Brady material *could* lead a defendant to try to withdraw a plea, but a) the "new" Brady material here isn't *factually* exculpatory and only tangentially relevant, b) only in an *infinitesimal* percentage of cases does a defendant try to withdraw a plea. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 21, 2018 Hibernated