Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Thu Feb 15 21:24:53 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

2/ POTUS can try to establish *narrowly tailored* "no-go zones" a witness will refuse to tread upon in answering questions, but the idea Trump can craft 25 questions (with preselected replies) Bannon will answer is hogwash and worthy of a Contempt citation and Obstruction charge. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 15, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

It's time to return to this executive privilege primer from a month ago. Trump is now misusing executive privilege in a way I didn't even contemplate in my consideration of the topic last month: he's deciding what specific questions people can answer. I've never seen that before. https://t.co/y7CU33 — PolitiTweet.org

(THREAD) "Executive privilege" is about to become the most important term in U.S. political discourse. This thread—… https://t.co/EGQGB2nYNt

Posted Feb. 15, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

3/ Moreover, there's no reason to think Trump can claim executive, deliberative, or presidential communications privilege for the period before his presidency, and there's no basis whatsoever for Bannon to believe he can or for his lawyer to believe he can. Again I say: Contempt. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 15, 2018 Hibernated