Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Sun Feb 11 06:08:08 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

18/ So the story the NYT was fed for partisan—not journalistic—purposes was a fraud: the leak was a sham *and* the *intelligence leaked* was a sham. Because neither the CIA nor the NSA had *any* interest in the supposed Trump tape. So you should've been nowhere near this story. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 11, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

17/ The worst part: the Russian, his Kremlin bosses, and some—definitionally disloyal—U.S. IC agents desperately wanted the NYT to report that U.S. law enforcement/counterintelligence were duped into diving into the Russia scandal half-assed. But they *didn't actually do that*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 11, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

19/ Were this an academic case study, I'd tell my students the temptation to run with a story because a) you can, b) you know it'll be read, and c) it meets the "timely" requirement for newsworthiness *but no other* is powerful and incredibly dangerous. This is a cautionary tale. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 11, 2018 Hibernated