Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Fri Feb 09 06:05:27 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

4/ I think you'd agree, @MddeH, Quartz published the piece not because Navalny has video of Deripaska and a Kremlin agent chatting about nothing in particular but because Manafort's prior offer/contacts to Deripaska and the secrecy of the chat here lend weight to Navalny's claim. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 9, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

3/ So "proof" is the wrong word—used by me because it's pretty tiring when you're at Tweet #98 in a thread. But I'll say this: Navalny makes the allegation Trump was discussed, and that that explains the need for absolute secrecy in a simple conversation on U.S.-Russia relations. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 9, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

5/ I retract "proof" and replace it with "strong circumstantial evidence"—strong enough that I'd say about 95 of every 100 criminal investigators would say, if they had a gun to their head, that Deripaska and Prikhodko, discussing US-Russia relations on 8/9/16, brought up Trump. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 9, 2018 Hibernated