Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Wed Feb 07 06:17:37 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

34/ Mueller could be prevented from subpoenaing Trump by regs; could—though unlikely—lose in court when he tries to subpoena him; Trump could assert a blanket Fifth Amendment claim as the presumed target of an Obstruction investigation; Mueller could've referred a charge by then. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 7, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

33/ I'll start with the first of those observations. Because pundits don't know who Mueller plans to charge—or for what—and whether Trump will be a witness or defendant by the time Mueller finally wins the right (after, presumably, a court battle) to subpoena him, all is in flux. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 7, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

35/ At the same time, we don't *know* if those things can or will happen, which is why legal pundits aren't going on TV and very clearly saying, "He should just refuse a voluntary interview because there's no way Mueller can ever compel him to testify." They're *not* saying that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 7, 2018 Hibernated