Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Wed Feb 07 06:08:17 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

29/ Mueller would be able to challenge any Fifth Amendment assertion Trump made from the witness stand before a grand jury if he believed the assertion was made on a topic entirely unrelated to Obstruction (the issue Trump's lawyers would've told Mueller Trump won't speak about). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 7, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

28/ In the unlikely event that Mueller successfully subpoenaed Trump under an understanding that Trump was just a witness in the non-Obstruction case Mueller was then investigating, and would only assert the Fifth as to questions relating to Obstruction, here's how it would work: — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 7, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

30/ Of course, Trump's lawyers wouldn't be able to advise him to plead the Fifth on a non-Obstruction question in that scenario (presumably, Trump would ask to check in with his lawyers—who wouldn't be in the room—were he asked a question and unsure if he could plead the Fifth). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 7, 2018 Hibernated