Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Tue Feb 06 02:31:56 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

4/ The same goes for Shearer—in reverse. There's every reason to think he had partisan motives in conducting oppo research on Trump, but so too does *every* such researcher even loosely connected to a political entity or party. The question always remains: is the intel accurate? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 6, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

3/ Steele's an ex-MI6 Russia desk chief with the best sources in Russia a Western spy could develop—so there's reason to think his intel is largely accurate. That *doesn't* me that I or anyone else interested in his dossier don't think the FBI should seek to corroborate his work. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 6, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

5/ Inaccurate intel is easily dismissed by those who appear in it, as even if it's taken seriously it usually makes time, place, and other errors that let it be disproven with documents, alibis, and more. Yet Trump and Nunes are acting like they're *terrified* of Shearer's memo. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 6, 2018 Hibernated