Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Fri Feb 02 19:57:12 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

54/ Just because the GOP has rejected Steele's research doesn't mean that *Steele* is obligated to: indeed, him telling a DOJ attorney he didn't want Trump to be president in September '16 is *confirmation* that—and this seems important—he *believed his research to be accurate*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

53/ I now have new favorite part: Page 3, which argues that Steele's desire that Trump not be elected—as expressed in *September '16* (note the date)—proves his research was biased. Does the GOP realize the info Steele had by September? Of *course* he didn't want him to be POTUS! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

55/ So there's a trend: everything the memo says discredits Steele a) confirms his integrity and the veracity of his research or b) directs the media quite forcefully to investigate the pro-Trump conspiracy at the New York field office of the FBI that Steele was so worried about. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated