Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Fri Feb 02 19:23:00 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

34/ Spoiler alert: *nothing* in the case law supports this contention from the memo. The FBI had absolutely *no* obligation to talk about Fusion and Perkins Coie in analyzing or employing work by the former Russia desk chief of MI6, who didn't know who his client was at the time. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

33/ The memo next says the FBI was obligated to disclose the Fusion-Perkins Coie contractual relationship in citing work *Steele* did—without knowing who he was doing it for—even though the FBI had independent corroboration of Steele's credibility and this particular work anyway. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

35/ Let me be even clearer on this point: of all the informants the FBI has ever used, someone in Steele's situation and with his background undoubtedly falls into the *top 10% of most reliable and non-conflicted* FBI sources. To imply otherwise is—as I said earlier—a *fantasy*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 2, 2018 Hibernated