![Profile Image](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1621716861220954112/o0SiHjO3_normal.jpg)
Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
7/ So here we have a corrupt (i.e. purely self-interested) attempt to influence a witness in a pending investigation, and we have—though the law doesn't even require it—clear proof the corrupt influence successfully altered *sworn testimony*. It's a crime and must be called so. — PolitiTweet.org