Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 9, 2023

Created

Sat Mar 04 03:14:04 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@AdamG01UNC It’s almost always the job of the foreperson to underscore to their fellow jurors that an initial vote for conviction/acquittal doesn’t mean that the jury isn’t going to review the evidence. It’s almost unheard of for a jury to stop after the first vote. A judge wouldn’t have it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 4, 2023

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@brklynmind Sorry, maybe I wasn’t clear. What I’m saying is that any case where the initial jury vote is 25% for something *other* than conviction is not being treated as a “slam dunk” by the jury that heard the evidence, whatever folks at home watching on TV may be thinking about it all. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 4, 2023

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@supertech427 @mrsangiecox Yeah, honestly Netflix should not have done that and the lawyers should not have allowed it. This is the first I am hearing of that series (as I said, I really did not follow any of this). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 4, 2023