Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 9, 2023

Created

Sat Mar 04 03:10:25 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@CalZoniGalT Certainly possible. It’d just also be a very uncommon sort of occurrence to have happened to three jurors after so many weeks of evidence being presented and gone over ad nauseam. (Also that there would be just a single piece of evidence that would swing 3 jurors in <45 minutes.) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 4, 2023

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(In theory a juror might vote for acquittal in a first vote just to ensure there’s a full airing of the evidence, but after 6 weeks clearly there *was* going to be an airing out even if the initial vote was unanimous for conviction, so I struggle to think that that explains it.) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 4, 2023

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@PamAdam93582596 Sorry, maybe I wasn’t clear. What I’m saying is that any case where the initial jury vote is 25% for something *other* than conviction is not being treated as a “slam dunk” by the jury that heard the evidence, whatever folks at home watching on TV may be thinking about it all. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 4, 2023 Just a Typo