Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 1, 2022

Created

Sat Nov 19 23:19:20 +0000 2022

Likes

528

Retweets

207

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Donald Trump attorney John Eastman, a very good friend of both Clarence and Ginni Thomas, claimed to have advance knowledge of how Thomas would rule if Trump achieved his goal of getting a Moore v. Harper–style case to SCOTUS pre-January 6. Eastman was in touch with Ginni Thomas. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Clarence and Ginni Thomas are all over this report. Given that the latter was a leading Trump presidential adviser, the question must now be asked, “Did Trump receive advance, politically advantageous notice of Supreme Court decisions from Ginni Thomas?” https://t.co/7Ds9ZLbkhI — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@tedterrific To my knowledge it’s not criminal—just impeachable. It’s the same with presidents—some actions are impeachable but not criminal, which is not to say that these present the clearest of all possible cases for impeachment—they don’t—but that they’re technically impeachment-eligible. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 19, 2022