Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 14, 2022

Created

Fri Nov 11 02:09:16 +0000 2022

Likes

214

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

No need to take my word for it, you can now read the order yourself. From the very first paragraph it’s patently political and it quickly becomes logically unsustainable—not to mention the standing issue it sidestepped. It reads like a political document. https://t.co/INTIlvqtge — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 11, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

This will of course be appealed. The standing issues which were blithely swept aside here will ultimately be addressed. The constitutional conclusion drawn by this know-nothing Trump judge will likely *not* pass muster at the circuit level. But before a rogue *SCOTUS*? Who knows. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 11, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

To be clear, there is a section in the order on standing. What I am suggesting is that it is not a serious or comprehensible discussion of the question. It is a lot of words to merely say that anyone can complain about a federal program that does not affect them but they dislike. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 11, 2022