Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 7, 2022

Created

Mon Sep 05 21:13:58 +0000 2022

Likes

614

Retweets

126

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS3/ A judge can only take what’s called judicial notice of facts not in evidence on a motion by one of the parties, but here she’s already said Trump is special—she can take into account items not properly before her—so how is she drawing the line on her deviation from protocol? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS2/ I’ll also say that I consider it odd that Cannon feels compelled to consider certain facts not in evidence—a 2024 run Trump hasn’t announced; legal claims he hasn’t/won’t make—but not *other* known facts, like the movant’s decades-long history of bad-faith delaying tactics. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS4/ It’s for all the foregoing reasons that my rather curt and snarky tweets about the ruling this morning focused on just two possibilities: (a) Judge Cannon is a political partisan more than she is a judge, or (b) she’s *acting* that way because she’s scared of MAGA terrorism. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022