Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 7, 2022

Created

Mon Sep 05 20:30:25 +0000 2022

Likes

891

Retweets

157

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

16/ Nor has DOJ given any indication, to anyone, that it intends to violate its own pre-election policies—though frankly it wouldn’t be in investigating Trump, who’s actually *not covered by them* as an ex-president. In fact AG Garland publicly recommitted himself to these rules. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

15/ But even more importantly, Judge Cannon actually held in her ruling that DOJ had not abused its authority—had *not* abused Trump’s constitutional rights—which makes any explanation of her ruling in grounded in the opposite claim wildly self-contradictory and even nonsensical. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

17/ And the clear purpose of these rules isn’t to protect politicians; rather, it’s to protect *voters* from unscrupulous *prosecutors* who might seek to unduly influence them with politically motivated prosecutions of *candidates*. It has nothing to do with non-candidate Trump. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 5, 2022