Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 30, 2022

Created

Fri Aug 26 19:18:10 +0000 2022

Likes

1,098

Retweets

208

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(1 of 2) A philosophical question, on the order of, “If a tree falls in a forest...”: If a president declassifies a document he is already entitled to see and *tells no one that he has done so*, in what sense is that document declassified? Nothing has changed about its handling. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 26, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

As everyone in America knows, because it’s right there in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the FBI is required to determine if the owner of a property to be searched is experiencing his “best poll numbers ever” before seeking a court-ordered search warrant — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 26, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(2 of 2) As near as I can tell the only reason a president would declassify a document but tell absolutely no one that he’s done so is because he wants to *secretly* show that document to someone not otherwise entitled to see it and have an *excuse* ready if he’s caught doing so. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 26, 2022