Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 27, 2022

Created

Tue Aug 23 16:47:42 +0000 2022

Likes

336

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS2) So if you’re a judge, not only are you *not* thinking documents covered by executive privilege need to be sifted out, you’re demanding an evidentiary basis for Trump’s lawyers suggesting there’s reason to think attorney-client privileged docs were stored in those areas. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 23, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS) Elie is right that under normal circumstances you’d expect a neutral party to sift docs, but in this instance it seems Trump’s own lawyers acknowledged that the area(s) from which things were taken were being used as storage for government records, *not* other types of docs. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 23, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS3) And at some point there must be an acknowledgment by the judicial system—even if it’s implicit and never put on the record—that you’re dealing with the litigant in the United States *most famous* for attempting to delay his cases. This too seems like just a delaying tactic. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 23, 2022