Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 6, 2023

Created

Sun Aug 21 16:03:33 +0000 2022

Likes

262

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

A separate question is whether a private company with significant leeway to regulate speech within its ambit can decide not to regulate speech that kills people—like COVID-19 disinformation—and then be indignant when that elective commercial judgment devastates its public image. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 21, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

But by the same token, there’s nothing more consistent with the history of free speech in America than a private company deciding to hurt its own bottom line by ignoring its customers. What it can’t do is wrap itself in the mantle of free speech—it’s making a commercial decision. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 21, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

So can Chris Best choose to platform COVID-19 disinformation merchants, thereby knowingly endangering public safety? Yes—he can. And that’s a *commercial* and *moral* decision with f*ck-all to do with “free speech”—as free speech says Best can regulate disinformation as he likes. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 21, 2022