Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Aug. 14, 2022

Created

Thu Aug 11 20:29:55 +0000 2022

Likes

493

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS2) If DOJ chose to act like a moving party by filing a motion rather than a non-objection to JW’s motion, it’d be to a) stick it in the eye of JW by robbing it of a victory, b) performatively assert it has nothing to hide. Procedurally, it could just not object to JW’s motion. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 11, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS) Trump doesn’t like to be seen as a loser/outmaneuvered. If he doesn’t object whatsoever to the Motion to Unseal, it’s an unqualified loss for him because he knows that the search warrant was perfectly legal and wholly in order. So I’d expect a qualified objection. We’ll see. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 11, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

(PS3) Either way, the important thing is that DOJ was on a court deadline. AG Garland *had* to make a decision today; this wasn’t a surprise DOJ maneuver to create drama. Once a warrant has been executed, there’s an initial presumption that it can (and should) now be made public. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 11, 2022