Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 4, 2022

Created

Thu Jun 30 02:40:10 +0000 2022

Likes

1,027

Retweets

171

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

18/ The difference, of course, is that Trump’s 2017 witness-tampering scheme successfully kept Manafort off the table—so DOJ would’ve had to proceed only with Obstruction charges against Trump (who it couldn’t indict then, because he was president). But matters are different now. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

17/ The concern is that DOJ will do with this evidence what it did with the evidence it received of a similar character during the Mueller investigation: nothing. The scope of Trump’s ex post facto crimes of Obstruction was so vast that the DOJ threw up its hands and walked away. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

19/ Not only is Trump no longer POTUS and thus eligible for indictment, the witnesses he’s tampering with are also indictable. This makes it much harder for DOJ to ignore the campaign-finance, wire-fraud, witness-tampering, and obstruction crimes that the Committee is uncovering. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 30, 2022