Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 21, 2022

Created

Sat Jun 18 02:34:24 +0000 2022

Likes

1,694

Retweets

474

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

30/ This new PROOF report explains why this is in fact *exactly* how Trump Legal saw things post-election. They didn’t believe they needed 5 votes, and didn’t think they could *get* 5 votes. But they could get 1 Justice to declare an issue a “political question” in a declination. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 18, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

29/ What if all you need is for the Court to agree to *hear arguments* on a case, because that could give you injunctive relief as you seek to push back a session of Congress? That only requires 4 votes. Or what if all you need is a *note* attached by 1 Justice to a declination? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 18, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

31/ Moreover, what sort of *crazy* magic could turn 2 Justices you know you have on your side based on leaks (Thomas, Alito) into the *4* Justices you need to get you *injunctive relief* in advance of oral argument? How can a leak turn 2 Justices into 4? Well—just look at Dobbs. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 18, 2022