Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 21, 2022

Created

Sat Jun 18 02:31:13 +0000 2022

Likes

1,299

Retweets

332

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

28/ If you understand the basic fact that there are 9 Justices on the Supreme Court and you need 5 to win a case, that last tweet seems *incomprehensible* at first blush. How could you win a case with fewer than five votes? Answer: if a win doesn’t require a ruling in your favor. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 18, 2022

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

27/ The evidence now suggests that Team Trump believed there was and would be a backchannel (and maybe more than one) between SCOTUS and Trump Legal, *and*—and this is where it gets even more confusing—Trump Legal did *not* need five votes on any case it brought before the Court. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 18, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

29/ What if all you need is for the Court to agree to *hear arguments* on a case, because that could give you injunctive relief as you seek to push back a session of Congress? That only requires 4 votes. Or what if all you need is a *note* attached by 1 Justice to a declination? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 18, 2022