Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 11, 2022

Created

Mon Jun 13 14:02:52 +0000 2022

Likes

441

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

27/ ...and b) evidence like what will be presented today puts real public pressure on DOJ to do something—not political pressure, as I do not think Garland is susceptible to that, but *evidentiary* pressure because the public now knows how strong the case against Donald Trump is. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 13, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

26/ While the HJ6C has no say in DOJ indicting Trump, a) it’s presenting evidence of a quality/volume that establishes “probable cause” at a minimum—the standard for indictment, though prosecutors don’t indict until they feel they can prove a case beyond a “reasonable doubt”—... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 13, 2022

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

28/ To be clear, based on the evidence I’ve published at PROOF, some of which has been cited by the H6JC and which I know the HJ6C follows, the evidence against Trump—who’s now just a citizen like you or me—is at the “beyond a reasonable doubt” level, not merely “probable cause.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 13, 2022