Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 21, 2022

Created

Sun Feb 27 00:46:53 +0000 2022

Likes

1,610

Retweets

341

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

1) If Trump runs and is elected in 2024—which would probably, for a third time, be a bid that came with Russian aid—Putin knows Trump would push to end any sanctions on Russia for what it did in 2022. 2) If Biden remains POTUS, Putin feels he has nothing to lose by invading now. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 27, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Once Russian cyberwar against the U.S. failed to secure for Trump a second term in 2020—unlike Putin's big success in aiding Trump in 2016—Putin no longer had a U.S. ally in taking down Ukrainian democracy from the inside. So he invaded Ukraine with two potential futures in mind: — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 27, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

The reason a recently released poll shows 62% of Americans saying that Putin wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if Trump were still president is because that is likely *true*—but *not* for the reason whatever percentage of the 62% (i.e., most of it) is made up of Trumpists *thinks*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 27, 2022 Hibernated