Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 21, 2022

Created

Sun Feb 13 21:00:40 +0000 2022

Likes

721

Retweets

138

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

40/ Clearly the Democratic investigation was rather indiscriminately gathering EOP—White House–originating—data if *99% of the data* was about Obama’s White House! Indeed, there can be no better evidence that Trump *wasn’t* being specifically targeted as to *that* stock of data. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

39/ What a lawyer would get from the filing is this: 1⃣ Durham can’t/won’t charge the witness in question—so he wants to destroy his reputation instead. 2⃣ Durham wants to publicly defend Trump for inexplicable pinging. 3⃣ Durham wants to try his case in public—because it sucks. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

41/ Moreover, if the data-collection effort was illegal, by all means indict, Durham! Indeed, the relevant charge would be *far* more serious—if you actually have any evidence of a crime—than the man you’ve *actually* charged! So why won’t Durham do it? Because he’s got nothing. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022 Hibernated