Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 21, 2022

Created

Sun Feb 13 20:51:52 +0000 2022

Likes

611

Retweets

102

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

35/ Lawyers must be cautious about raising Fifth Amendment issues for those they don’t represent, as you want to alert the court—and witness—that they might want to speak to a lawyer, but don’t want to publish your concerns widely and risk wrongly destroying someone’s reputation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

34/ But Durham didn’t alert the court that one of *his own witnesses* might have a Fifth Amendment issue, presumably because (a) he can’t charge him with anything, (b) he decided any such charge would be too minor to bother with, or (c) he knew *that* filing would be under seal. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

36/ But *Durham’s* bizarre, unnecessary motion not only takes a different tack (casually implying there could be something suspicious going on with the lawyers in the case, of which he has no evidence) but then going into facts on that score that he needn’t have mentioned at all. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022 Hibernated