Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 21, 2022

Created

Sun Feb 13 20:48:19 +0000 2022

Likes

649

Retweets

110

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

33/ The reason for this is that—as we know from Miranda v. Arizona—government agents (that includes judges) are supposed to provide persons who might incriminate themselves with a chance to speak to an attorney first. So officers of the court have to speak up in such situations. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

32/ The difference between what Durham did and what a normal attorney would’ve done is subtle—so let me explain. If a prosecutor or defense attorney knows a witness may incriminate themselves on the stand, that officer of the court is supposed to alert the court of this *first*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

34/ But Durham didn’t alert the court that one of *his own witnesses* might have a Fifth Amendment issue, presumably because (a) he can’t charge him with anything, (b) he decided any such charge would be too minor to bother with, or (c) he knew *that* filing would be under seal. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 13, 2022 Hibernated