Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 21, 2022

Created

Mon Jan 31 01:15:03 +0000 2022

Likes

598

Retweets

114

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

NOTE2/ ...that she'd likely challenge it in court either partially (like Jones) or fully (like Bannon and Meadows), which would presumably force Clarence Thomas to recuse himself over his wife's activities for the first time ever (if the case went to SCOTUS, as it likely would). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

NOTE/ I want to acknowledge something here that is already a topic of conversation among PROOF subscribers over at PROOF: *yes*, a Ginni Thomas subpoena would undoubtedly be among the most politically sensitive subpoenas ever issued in the United States, for the simple reason... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

NOTE3/ The twists wouldn't end there: if, like Eastman and Clark and—before it's over—surely others Ginni Thomas were to assert her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, it'd arguably force Thomas to recuse from *every* case involving Trump or 1/6 *in perpetuity*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2022 Hibernated