Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 21, 2022

Created

Mon Dec 06 19:40:00 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@TheKyleAndrews You could argue it’s further evidence that he intended to obstruct the *Flynn* investigation—a criminal course of conduct we knew about years ago—but people are saying that it is evidence of a new crime because he was trying to end an investigation of *him*. But there wasn’t one. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 6, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Was Trump trying to obstruct the Flynn probe? Of course. We know this. But saying he would’ve personally been harmed if Comey hadn’t been fired may be a reference to political fallout from the obstruction we know he committed—not a *new* confession that he was protecting himself. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 6, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

So this new statement would absolutely be valuable evidence in a criminal case against Trump that already was established beyond a reasonable doubt years ago, but it does not generate a new and discrete crime beyond the crimes Biden and Garland decided to let Trump get away with. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 6, 2021 Hibernated