Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 22, 2022

Created

Mon Nov 22 00:43:52 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@nancychando26 @RenkoStyranka You have to keep in mind I spent months getting—if only occasionally—annoyed messages from PROOF readers saying they *only* wanted writing about January 6 and domestic politics and nothing else. They didn't want an essay on film or classical rhetoric and got angry at such things. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 22, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@nancychando26 @RenkoStyranka ...has changed from the pre-digital period. Those essays are most appropriate for RETRO, especially as this essay has as its theme something *really* antique: Aristotelian rhetoric. A rumination on this isn't a good fit for PROOF, and would've led to complaints from some readers. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 22, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

@nancychando26 @RenkoStyranka I'll be continually calibrating what fits for PROOF and what fits for RETRO, but my hope is that using a legal case as a jumping-off point—or jumping-to point—for a discussion of film and classical rhetoric will show the scope of what RETRO can be, rather than a deficit in PROOF. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 22, 2021 Hibernated