Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 22, 2022

Created

Tue Oct 26 19:26:27 +0000 2021

Likes

334

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS11/ This is like allowing a defendant to start on third base. He no longer needs to establish, if he considered it relevant to his defense, that he had personally observed these victims committing crimes—and therefore had a sense of their capacity for imminent criminal conduct. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 26, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS10/ First, by imputing to the homicide victims permanent statuses that establish them as criminals, the judge allows the defense to imply to the jury that Rittenhouse had evidence of the homicide victims committing crimes at the time he killed them. But that’s a *trial issue.* — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 26, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS12/ But it’s not clear that those crimes can be considered *violent* crimes; or that Rittenhouse was in a position to adjudicate whether they’d been committed or not; or certainly if a lawyer should be able to accuse homicide victims of crimes without establishing a foundation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 26, 2021 Hibernated