Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 22, 2022

Created

Tue Oct 26 19:06:33 +0000 2021

Likes

480

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS4/ So while it’s something that can be debated, it’s in the range of something that happens for a judge to deem “victim” out of bounds at a trial like this—but to combine that borderline decision with the equivalent of trial-less criminal convictions for the victims is obscene. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 26, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS3/ Where a defendant admits he committed a homicide but says he had a defense for doing so, it’s arguably a close call; there are definitely “victims” in the case, but the question is whether a jury can be told (yet) that they should be seen as “victims” *as to that defendant*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 26, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS5/ What I would expect is for a judge to order the use of the word “decedent” if “victim” is going to be precluded—though they certainly were victims of a homicide, the only question is whether it was a justified homicide—while also precluding “rioter,” “looter,” or “arsonist.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 26, 2021 Hibernated