Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 27, 2020

Created

Mon Oct 19 17:43:54 +0000 2020

Likes

217

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

And the reasoning here is so circular: we mustn't have an investigation of whether Trump colluded with the Saudis and Emiratis and Israelis to win the 2016 election because, says this writer, you don't investigate presidents who were "democratically" elected in a "fair" election. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

But it's historically nauseating cravenness to say that any attempt to investigate the most corrupt administration in American history automatically qualifies as "vengeance," and anyone who thinks rule of law requires it must be regarded as a "partisan." That's an outrageous lie. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Andrew Weissmann's book underscores that Mueller found significant evidence of pre-election coordination (collusion)—but couldn't prove conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt once Trump obstructed justice (beyond a reasonable doubt) to shut down critical witnesses. See the problem? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 19, 2020 Hibernated