Seth Abramson @SethAbramson
With all due respect to all involved here—and those sharing this article—there's no such thing as a Supreme Court ruling "requiring" a Supreme Court justice to do anything. Recusal is in the discretion of each justice. That's why this nomination is so damn reckless and dangerous. — PolitiTweet.org
Carrie Johnson @johnson_carrie
Important new analysis from Judge Luttig: A 2009 Supreme Court ruling may require Barrett to recuse herself from 20… https://t.co/ZUG8HxHiNV