Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 16, 2020

Created

Wed Dec 04 02:19:48 +0000 2019

Likes

729

Retweets

164

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

13/ Moreover, it confirms publicly—for the first time—that the feds know *exactly* the *sort* of activity Nader was involved in pre- and post-election: aiding foreign nations in meddling in our elections, seeking to cover it up, and reporting to foreign nationals while doing so. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

12/ Those who think this is "bad for Clinton" have *no idea* what they're talking about. The case has nothing to do with *Clinton*—but it *has* put the *top federal witness against Trump* in *so* much more legal jeopardy than he was already in that him flipping is nearly certain. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

14/ The confusion of some folks about why this case matters stems from an assumption—which may be correct about others, but *certainly* isn't about me and many folks I respect—that progressives think it's "bad" whenever a Democratic donor goes down. No. It's called "rule of law." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019 Hibernated