Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 15, 2020

Created

Mon Dec 02 02:54:29 +0000 2019

Likes

367

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS/ I'm willing to retweet THE HILL if it's from the news division, not editorial, *and* comports with all other major-media reporting. This one is close to the line. There are no "missing" witnesses, and the Kremlin's conspiracy theories aren't "unproven" but *without evidence*. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

Actually? It's pretty tight already, from this attorney's perspective—especially when you consider the major-media investigative reporting that wasn't the subject of federal testimony. In other words, take everything reliable in the public sphere and the evidence is overwhelming. — PolitiTweet.org

How Democrats' missing witnesses could fill in the Ukraine story https://t.co/qpnbQPhO9O https://t.co/HtZrqQ7E3B

Posted Dec. 2, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

PS2/ For instance, Mueller opined early on in his report that Trump advisers, allies, agents, and associates had—variously—refused to be interviewed, withheld evidence, destroyed evidence, and lied about their actions and knowledge. Was that "missing" evidence—or obstruction? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2019 Hibernated